sunglocto@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoThe Programmer Compasslemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square161fedilinkarrow-up1598
arrow-up1598imageThe Programmer Compasslemmy.dbzer0.comsunglocto@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square161fedilink
minus-squareBartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up106·2 months agoHow the fuck is C++ more traditional than C?
minus-squaretakeda@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up48·2 months agoTo me it looks like to position within each of quadrant want taken into account.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up34·2 months agoIt really seems like the creator didn’t bother with spacing at all. Something that did consider spacing within quadrants wouldn’t have its items this closely packed together.
minus-squareaaaaaaaaargh@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up22·2 months agoI think it’s not meant to be more traditional, the icon positions seem random and only the square they’re located is important.
minus-squaresudo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 months agoC was incredibly disruptive 50 years ago.
How the fuck is C++ more traditional than C?
To me it looks like to position within each of quadrant want taken into account.
It really seems like the creator didn’t bother with spacing at all. Something that did consider spacing within quadrants wouldn’t have its items this closely packed together.
I think it’s not meant to be more traditional, the icon positions seem random and only the square they’re located is important.
C was incredibly disruptive 50 years ago.
Tradition++