• Forester@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m glad you took the time to not read the article I put your way. Because if you had you’d realize that it’s only a couple hundred cubic meters of long-term waste that will be needing to be sent to deep geological storage. It’s not some endless amount.

    95% of all nuclear waste is low-level or medium contamination that will be inert within 200 years.

    Furthermore, you cannot pass off responsibility to the government for blocking access. If you’re actively campaigning that you don’t want those materials in your state, you are the NIMBY that’s making your state legislators. Choose those decisions

    And really trains trains is your argument. How uninitiated are you in nuclear contamination? Like of all the examples you could have given, did you really have no clue that we specifically engineered those solid casks to be moved on rail lines and made them impossible to break and have purposely slammed locomotives head on into them and broke the locomotive not the cast. https://youtu.be/Bu1YFshFuI4