• SaraTonin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    18 days ago

    The article says it’s a 2002 laptop and says it would have been “significantly out of date” when Half-Life 2 launched. Half-Life 2 launched in 2004. So that’s 2 years. He’s also reduced the resolution to 512x512 - less than half the original resolution - and hasn’t recreated several of the lighting effects.

    I don’t know what unoptimised games this is supposed to be a middle finger to specifically, but it strikes me that it wouldn’t be considered particularly out of the ordinary to find a modern game that could run on a 2023 machine at less than half resolution and with significantly reduced lighting effects.

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 days ago

      TBF, at the time, 800x600 was a pretty standard resolution. For gaming on a low-end PC, you might go down to 640x480 to get a better framerate, which wouldn’t look too bad on a CRT.

      • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 days ago

        Sure, I’m just arguing against the framing of this as “he got this super-graphics-intense programme to run on a PC which would have been considered a relic at the time”, when actually he ran significantly downgraded graphics on a PC which would have been 2 years old at the time.

    • kay4749@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      How old are you?

      Back in 2002, gaming laptops cost ~$5000.

      If this is just an average laptop for the time, then this is very impressive.

      I’m guessing you just saw the other upvoted comment and had to parrot it to fit in.