ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 days agoPOV: You're a programmerlemmy.worldimagemessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1849
arrow-up1849imagePOV: You're a programmerlemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 days agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squarebalsoft@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoPersonally I’m more partial to nom. Serde is quite verbose and complex for a parser.
minus-squarefuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agoFrom Scratch (as much as I like Rust, it’s very likely more verbose from scratch). Haskell is perfect for these kinds of things.
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoI will concede that implementing the first version in Haskell would be better. Mostly so that we can then fulfil the meme of reimplementing it Rust!
serde has entered the chat
Personally I’m more partial to nom. Serde is quite verbose and complex for a parser.
From Scratch (as much as I like Rust, it’s very likely more verbose from scratch). Haskell is perfect for these kinds of things.
I will concede that implementing the first version in Haskell would be better.
Mostly so that we can then fulfil the meme of reimplementing it Rust!