• kennedy@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 个月前

    yes they should talk about it but that’s not what he’s reviewing. He’s focusing on the hype around the OS and if its even deserving of that. Why would a tech review bring in politics, it would come off as him just hating dhh and some would wave him off as a “hater”. I think the fact that he’s just talking about the software gives him credibility and shows that dhh is just a shit developer when it comes to operating systems. There’s already enough pieces about how he might be a shit human being but not enough about if he’s deserving of his merit just because he helped developed ruby on rails.

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 个月前

      sure sure, but the review is about an OPINIONATED SOFTWARE e.g. the Opinions of DHH. So of course it should be part of the review.

      A shit opinion of Dhh is for example, that you can’t partition or use a partition as the target in the install script and have to sacrifice an entire disk…

      • kennedy@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 个月前

        opinionated software is about how you think software should behave. its not about personal world views related to how a person thinks other people should be treated in the real world.