Caliss que l’on est gourverné par des envies de chier

  • 007Ace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    It is very interesting to see the pendulum swing. I do find the title misleading as the article appears to only apply to wearing religious symbols and it only applying to new employees as already employed are exempt.

    It also doesn’t seem to differentiate between public, private or subsidized daycares. Lots of open air in this article.

      • 007Ace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I think every Canadian sees Quebec marching to the beat of their own drum. I’ve never seen them vote for any party but Bloc Québécois as long as I’ve been watching.

    • IndridCold@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m an anti-theist and believe religion does untold damage to society. In my perfect world I’m completely for the removal of all religion iconography in publicly funded institutions. This includes clothing, jewellery, and gaudy John 3:16 t-shirts.

      If it’s private, do whatever you want. If you want a grotesque image of your dead god on a cross hanging on your wall, you do you. I just don’t want to pay for that out of my tax dollars.

      That said, I understand people wear a bunch of stupid shit for their gods, and that is a freedom of expression that should be protected. If someone wears a magic cross, bulletproof underwear of protection, or has to hide their hair because their god hates hairdos, then whatever. That in itself probably isn’t going to hang black people, start an ethnic genocide, or fly planes into buildings.

      As long as these religious kooks don’t spout their hateful superstitious bullshit to the kids, I’m fine with it.