You’ll have to go read it to find out. Isn’t this a fun game? You don’t even know what my argument is unless you’ve read over 400 pages, because I haven’t said shit other than “go read.”
Nor I about the fictional universe of you imaginary anarchy theory. I only know what has happened in the past and I can postulate about what will happen in the future. Those are, of course, behaviors that many people like you fail to demonstrate, instead relying on the words of others to make your statements in your stead.
TBH if you couldn’t make an argument on your own then citing some absurd scripture or manifesto wouldn’t have helped you.
Wikipedia
Samuel Beckett’s Trilogy
Is… that where you got all your ideas about anarchism?
You’ll have to go read it to find out. Isn’t this a fun game? You don’t even know what my argument is unless you’ve read over 400 pages, because I haven’t said shit other than “go read.”
But I don’t claim to know anything about this trilogy!
Nor I about the fictional universe of you imaginary anarchy theory. I only know what has happened in the past and I can postulate about what will happen in the future. Those are, of course, behaviors that many people like you fail to demonstrate, instead relying on the words of others to make your statements in your stead.
But you are actually acting like you know anything at all about anarchism, despite not.
Not your fictional universe of imaginary anarchy, no, I don’t know a thing about it.
Only of real anarchies in the past.
Theory means fuck all in the face of history.