The libs formed a provisional government. They constituent assembly was a meeting to establish a new constitution and parliamentary system. Lenin said no. Then the Soviet system took over. The dumas were old city councils established under Alexander II as a reform to keep the poors happy. So the first prompt is to support the transitional government. The second is saying you would work with all parties, even the libs. The third is all about doing this constitution thing. The fourth is the Soviet system. The last is saying you want to keep the old system.
Hypothetically, I’d be willing to negotiate and find a compromise between factions but the central point that the war needs to end, immediately, is non-negotiable. We gotta turn off the meat grinder. Otherwise, what was even the point? I get the feeling that that point would have me wind up aligning with the Bolshevists in practice (which is what I got), but that’s probably why I wound up a little to their right.
See this is where the agree disagree thing falls apart. I went agree on the convocation BECAUSE the assembly needed to resolve matters or be shown to be unwilling to do so and thus dissolved. However the quiz takes that to mean SUPPORT for the constituent assembly.
It is like the usual compass and “billionaires should be taxed more”, saying strongly disagree can mean you are ancap or mean you think billionaires should not exist full stop.
The libs formed a provisional government. They constituent assembly was a meeting to establish a new constitution and parliamentary system. Lenin said no. Then the Soviet system took over. The dumas were old city councils established under Alexander II as a reform to keep the poors happy. So the first prompt is to support the transitional government. The second is saying you would work with all parties, even the libs. The third is all about doing this constitution thing. The fourth is the Soviet system. The last is saying you want to keep the old system.
Hypothetically, I’d be willing to negotiate and find a compromise between factions but the central point that the war needs to end, immediately, is non-negotiable. We gotta turn off the meat grinder. Otherwise, what was even the point? I get the feeling that that point would have me wind up aligning with the Bolshevists in practice (which is what I got), but that’s probably why I wound up a little to their right.
See this is where the agree disagree thing falls apart. I went agree on the convocation BECAUSE the assembly needed to resolve matters or be shown to be unwilling to do so and thus dissolved. However the quiz takes that to mean SUPPORT for the constituent assembly.
It is like the usual compass and “billionaires should be taxed more”, saying strongly disagree can mean you are ancap or mean you think billionaires should not exist full stop.