OpenAI says hundreds of thousands of ChatGPT users may show signs of manic or psychotic crisis every week.
Archived version: https://archive.is/20251027183454/https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-psychosis-and-self-harm-update/
OpenAI says hundreds of thousands of ChatGPT users may show signs of manic or psychotic crisis every week.
Archived version: https://archive.is/20251027183454/https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-psychosis-and-self-harm-update/
I dipped in for this:
I didnt see any comparison to overall population.
That said, LLMs are literally hallucination engines. If you treat them like they are real, psychosis seems inevitable.
While there is some overlap, Bipolar disorder very much does not map 1:1 with people experiencing psychosis. So that isnt very helpful.
Yeah, there’s no real data for “show signs of manic or psychotic crisis,” as far as I can tell. I just went for the low-hanging fruit, since mania is often part of bipolar (manic-depressive). But if just bipolar is sitting at 2.8% of Americans in a given year, I think it’s reasonable to say the loosely defined global stats in the article aren’t notably high.
Ahh, right, that is what I was getting at. I suspect that the percentage of people who have at some point experienced psychotic symptoms is probably higher than most people realize.
It’s extrapolated from their own user count:
Sure, but I mean the more important numbers, which would be how this compares to a control sample, or at least comparing it to the overall population. Otherwise this could be less psychosis than expected.
I feel like science denialist cultism is a form of psychosis the vast majority of people seem to have, so measuring it every week from a few hundred thousand people is surprisingly low