• Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think the GP has it more correct; France wanted a democratic parliament with representation for all*. What they got instead was a socialist revolution led by a paranoid puritan.

    England had already survived Oliver Cromwell (their version of Napoleon) and had an established parliament with representation for all* and strict controls on royal power.

    Meanwhile, British forces were all out trying to keep the colonies under control; you could easily argue that the formation of the US is the British version of the French Revolution — and then it happened again in other colonies, until England got sick of the liabilities and told the commonwealth to go manage itself.

    • sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Why does socialism seem so correlated or directly causitive to mass killings, I dont mean Denmark socialism, I mean like russian and the french kind at the time you’re talking about.

      I thoroughly support socialized medicine and collective access and all the “goodies” stuff about socialism, I’m just curious how theres was always at some point a leap from the good shit to dystopia.

      Unfettered neoliberal Capitalism is no better but its a whole lot better at sweeping all the social murder under the rug and gaining political support every other 4 years the pendulum seems to incomprehensibly swing the far opposite direction…sigh