• Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I linked the MSN syndicated version because the washingtonpost is often paywalled or broken in other ways. (When I load this article there currently I am getting only the first paragraph of the article, with no indication that there is actually more.)

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      FWIW MSN is from Microsoft so IMHO might be better to link to the original source and, if need be, remind people they can either pay for journalist content or use services like archive.is which will bypass paywalls.

      • Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        The Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos so I certainly wouldn’t suggest that anyone should pay them for anything.

        I do often use archive.is (which, FWIW, is “privately funded” by a person unknown and in 2025 still says in its FAQ “With the current growth rate I am able to keep the archive free of ads. Well, I can promise it will have no ads at least till the end of 2014.”) and it is certainly useful but via Tor or a VPN it often requires solving multiple recaptcha (google) captchas so it is not my first choice for bypassing paywalls.

        I am curious why @rossome@lemmy.ml got redirected to the MSN home page though; for me (with ads blocked by ublock origin) the page is loading just fine.