• Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Paradox games should be automatically disqualified. If your game only becomes “Good” around the fifth DLC release (Out of 20 or more) and you are expected to get your hands on all of them, that’s not good.

    • SevenSkalls [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Don’t they usually have awards for best DLC anyway? I’ve never played a Paradox game except for a little bit of HoI once, but it sounds like they’d be more deserving of that kind of award.

      • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It would be a category it would make more sense for them to participate in. But I can’t see them winning, given that some DLC are like old style expansion packs or serve as mini sequels.

    • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      as an ex-paradox fanboy i hate paradox fanboys.

      their monetization model is straight up exploitative and they abuse the studios they act as publisher for regularly.

      on top of that, their games give a whitewashed view of history and reinforce people’s bad historigraphical and historical practices. there’s a reason there’s a smattering of braindead fucking neonazis festering on the paradox forums…

      • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        There is something sinister about the fact that the holocaust isn’t a factor in their ww2 game, but the purges are a central crippling mechanic for the soviets. Also the fact that the holocaust isnt real but their other games allow for a genocide button.