Experts told lawmakers that families that needed mortgages were being outbid by private equity landlords with all-cash offers, and that they were jacking up rents, piling on junk fees, neglecting repairs and fueling eviction rates that local officials called destabilizing.

By 2024, it had gotten so bad that Rep. Pat Ryan, D-N.Y., demanded a Federal Trade Commission investigation. Ryan warned that private equity firms could control 40% of the single-family rental home market by 2030. (That’s non-apartments, or standalone homes that people rent to live in.)

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    I’m honestly surprised to see there isn’t more of a push from the parasites to “build our way out” of this via government subsidies for new construction. They get to buy a cheaper new house but still charge “market rate” extortion prices for rent.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 days ago

      I see you haven’t experienced the “We need more luxury apartments!” crowd like we have here in Seattle.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        more luxury apartments means rich people aren’t buying shitty old apartments and renovating them.

        where i live everyone is buying old housing stock, and taking a million dollar home and making it 3 million dollars.

        why? because there aren’t new homes for them to buy. because every town/city/neighborhood refuses to allow any new development and downsizes every housing project by like 30%.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          why? because there aren’t new homes for them to buy. because every town/city/neighborhood refuses to allow any new development and downsizes every housing project by like 30%.

          That’s an incorrect conclusion. I don’t think you understand that most everyone wants the older stock first. Wealthy and poor want good construction with a lot of room, and for as cheap as they can get.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        Oh God… Lol we almost had that somewhat recently but the “muh property value” people came out in force and stopped an apartment complex from being built.

    • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      There is absolutely a push by those people to do that. Why do you think the only solution that gets proposed for this problem is to build more housing for them to buy?

      The people in government proposing it are not required to wear labels showing their sponsors like Nascar drivers, so the linkage is not overt or public, but I absolutely believe that is why that solution is always the one presented in media and government. And, like the dummies that most Americans are, they see it in the media and start pushing for it themselves, because someone told them that’s the answer.