• NuraShiny [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I do and I realize that, statistically, that is less save then flying. But if my car catches on fire, I can exit it and since I drive the same car every time I drive, I can notice if it needs repairs and whatnot. In a plane, I gotta hope that whoever serviced it didn’t fuck up.

      Also, most car problems, even crashes, are not deadly. I drive in the city and a crash even at 50 kph isn’t that likely to kill me. Meanwhile, any problem a plane might have is an immediate nightmare scenario.

      Sense of control vs no sense of control, I suppose.

      • juniper [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        FWIW you also have to drive if you live in most places in the US. Flying is optional but there isn’t a way to opt out of the four-wheeled death trap like you can with air travel.

      • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        i used to subscribe to the idea that flying was safer than driving and since i drove all the time, i should just zen out about flying.

        i drive way less now, but besides that, i think the undernining of the administrative state and its institutions is undermining the historic record for air travel safety, specifically the idea that historic statistics are a predictor for present and future reality.

        so, basically, fuck flying in the US.