BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 2 个月前In 1995, a Netscape employee wrote a hack in 10 days that now runs the Internetarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1217file-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.setechnology@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.net
arrow-up1217external-linkIn 1995, a Netscape employee wrote a hack in 10 days that now runs the Internetarstechnica.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 2 个月前message-square43fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.setechnology@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.net
minus-squareMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 个月前Yes, but all of the quirks it had back then are still there, for backwards compatibility
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-22 个月前Yeah, but only kind of. It depends if you’re using the new syntax. Within new language constructs (like classes and modules), code runs in strict mode without having to use "use strict". It gets rid of some of the annoying quirks.
Yes, but all of the quirks it had back then are still there, for backwards compatibility
Yeah, but only kind of. It depends if you’re using the new syntax. Within new language constructs (like classes and modules), code runs in strict mode without having to use
"use strict". It gets rid of some of the annoying quirks.