It was only a matter of time before an irate tradie threw hands at them.

We don’t get paid to sit in traffic.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not when it’s your time being wasted

    Besides, the delay caused would have been a lot more than fifteen minutes.

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Article literally says started just before 8, taken into custody at 815.

      And yes, they got delayed 15 min. A well paid trade makes what - 60-80 and hour? Assault charges are now worth what… $15-20??? Can I now throw some around for a little less than dinner? For making roadworks? Because a meeting runs over by 15 min? There is no way to justify assault for a 15 min wait.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The delay caused by this would have been much worse than fifteen minutes, because this would have had a ripple effect all through rush hour.

        And trades charge that much, they probably keep less than half of it as profit.

        Are you a child? Because you seem genuinely ignorant of how the world works.

        • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How much should we hate people who do road works or bicyclists or people who break down and cause delays. I am presuming you would support beating the shit out of them because you are a tradie and they cost you money and anybody who causes a tradie to lose money should be violently assaulted right?

        • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nope - mid 30s.

          Delay would have been worse than 15 - but I bet this guy wasn’t at the back of the queue.

          Yes, less than that profit unless they are self employed. So therefore assault for even less than that.

          Well aware, and can understand the context as well.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, less than that profit unless they are self employed. So therefore assault for even less than that.

            I can assure you self employed tradies still have significant expenses. I’m genuinely amazed you’re in your thirties and still think like this.

            • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Please list me which of those expenses accrue while sitting in traffic, and what costs justify assault with a vehicle and general assault.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Opportunity cost, happy. Opportunity cost.

                Now stop asking stupid questions, I’m not your tutor.

                • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Im sorry, opportunity cost? You mean what they gave up in exchange for that 15 minute wait? Literally the potential to make a portion of that $15-20 as profit? The happiness loss of a 15 minute delay? That is what you use to justify vehicular and physical assault.

                  So, let me go through this as I literally tutor opportunity cost - easiest way is to compare is divide what you give up vs what you get. I cant put happiness as a unit, so let’s go time.

                  Assaulting a person with a vehicle. Got you through a protest at best 15 minutes early - after the argument possibly closer to 8 or so, but let’s go instant result at say they were the first one and it got them through at the instant the protest started. You can argue plenty on the happiness gained from not being delayed, satisfaction of bullying someone, bragging stories over smoko, ego boost, but as I say no unit. They gained, at best, 15 minutes.

                  Now, looking at the summary of offenses act 1981 (113) S9 common assault, the maximum fine is 6 months imprisonment or a fine not exceeding $4000. Lets go half way, they got 3 months (12 weeks) prison, 12,960 minutes. They potentially gave up 12,960 minutes, and then have to go into the happiness discussion around missing kids and partners, loss of job, potentially loss of vehicle, standing in community, all that.

                  Gave up (12960 min) divided by what they got (15 minutes) - opportunity cost of 8064 what the got back from it.

                  It is worth noting that obstruction of public way is also covered in s22 - maximum fine of 1000 per person if not done for a good reason, and any good lawyer could argue climate change in real and possibly call self defense… if not, assault carried a higher financial cost that the three protests combined.

                  Now, because you clearly threw out a word that sounded good but you have no idea what it actually is, ill analyse the result in context for you. This is what is known as a no-win scenario, and the best strategy forward its to pick the one that costs you the least. Best case is to sit the fuck down, keep your fucking hands to yourself like we teach kids, let the cops do the job we pay them for, and maybe consider for one second these people are doing what they are doing because those with the money, big tradie cars and no education don’t give a flying fuck.