Original Post:

wNKS3BvvSc8isAa.jpeg

I asked, concisely and simply, what was being hidden from us. Most of them just berated me, one user claimed the Syria conflict to which I provided a link to a recent UN Statement on which quite accurately reflected the conflict start to finish. Another user claimed that the recently declassified Nixon era documents about the Chilean revolution and coup, but I was able to find a 1973 archived Newspaper accusing the Nixon Admin of having a hand in it from Times Magazine meaning it was already a mainstream theory at the time.

LD7NmaffkIAo4Au.png

https://feddit.online/post/1341994

      • Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        Quite a childish, troll response, just to reinforce how I’m right that you are only in here to waste everyone’s time with bullshit and I’ll keep letting everyone know it.

          • Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            That’s why you’re on lemmy in the first place. Your bullshit will work better back over on Reddit with the rest of the dumbass wet blankets.

            • FiniteBanjo@feddit.onlineOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              I am not on lemmy, at all. I am on PieFed because the PieFed devs are NOT pro-war, pro-genocide, pro-Russia, and Transphobic like the Lemmy Devs are.

    • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Okay, but what would you tell someone who was asking in good faith? Like if a 10 year old asked, what would you tell them?

      • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        See, the thing you have to understand is, they’re not interested in that question. They’re trying to “win.” That’s why ad hominem is so important: They can just say you’re bad-faith, and then strut off victorious. It’s actually a disadvantage if they engage factually.

        Why that is, is an exercise for the reader…

        • unfreeradical@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          OP was quite poorly behaved in the post that they are referencing, acting in bad faith as a troll completely uninterested in thinking or learning about the topic.

          The ignorance and incuriousity is exemplified by the irresponsible use of the term “tankie”, seeming to be a conflation with all socialists or leftists, or simply everyone whose position they personally fail to understand and refuse to respect.

          Some bullishness is generally warranted as a response to those who refuse to examine their own behavior.

          • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 days ago

            Feel free to answer the question. “Tankie” is by absolutely no means a conflation with all socialists or leftists. Tankies are right-wing, which is why we don’t like them.

            Again, feel free to answer the fairly basic question, IDK how you can refuse to do that and preemptively accuse any and every listener of being obviously incurious about the answer. You have no idea who’s reading this who you now have the opportunity to make a sensible argument to.

            • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              15 days ago

              So you’re engaging in bad faith? You have no intention of having an actual discussion, you just want an argument?

              • unfreeradical@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                Your conclusion is completely unsound.

                OP is a troll whose questions were addressed despite their complete lack of sincerity.

                No one should feel compelled to continue engaging such a bad actor with any earnestness.

                • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Your conclusion is completely unsound.

                  No, I don’t think it is.

                  OP is a troll whose questions were addressed despite their complete lack of sincerity.

                  OP got banned and called names for asking a question.

                  No one should feel compelled to continue engaging such a bad actor with any earnestness.

                  That’s how I feel about the people who banned someone for asking a question.

                  • unfreeradical@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    12 days ago

                    No one is being banned from the community simply for asking questions, if they are constructive and sincere.

                    Please stop being obtuse.

                    OP is a disruptive troll who was banned for deliberately antagonizing the community.

        • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          You would answer a 10 year old child’s question with a link to an article with a statement that would leave them feeling like you think they’re stupid? If you can’t explain something in terms a child could understand I don’t think you fully understand it either.

          • Zexks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            Some things arent simple enough for child minds. Such is the problem with all the flat earth and anti vaccine shit going around. Just because you dont understand something doesnt mean it isnt right or that you have any grounds to question it.

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      When every challenging question is presupposed to be “in bad faith”, no critical questioning “in good faith” is possible. “In bad faith” is just pretense to evade genuine debate & critical self-reflection.