The inability to use Adobe Creative Cloud on Linux is often cited as a major barrier for many users considering a switch to the platform. But perhaps, just perhaps, there has already been a breakthrough in that direction.

A community developer says they have resolved long-standing Wine compatibility issues that prevented Adobe Creative Cloud installers from completing on Linux, publishing a patchset and prebuilt binaries that they claim enable installation of Photoshop 2021 and Photoshop 2025.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    …but why?

    I guess if you have a ton of adobe specific assets and must be able to use adobe software because of legacy projects this might be useful but it just feels like tech debt.

    coupled with the fact that tons of accessible software now can open psd and ai filetypes… :| hooray, I guess?

    but for fuck’s sake people get off the creative cloud it’s turning into ai smog

  • justmorg000@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This would have been great like 10 years ago before Adobe fucked a decent product up with a subscription model and AI.

    • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      The good news is the old, non-subscription versions do work in Linux.

      Honestly, unless you make a shitload of money off it, subscription Adobe products are just too rich for my blood.

  • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Would like to see some confirmation, but this is probably the #1 thing I see people say is holding them back.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      19 hours ago

      In hindsight, I’m so glad I couldn’t get them working on linux, because it forced me to get my head around Darktable. I couldn’t go back to Lightroom now…

      • Scoopta@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Honestly I feel like that’s very common with Linux. If you’re willing to deal with the growing pain of switching it ends up working out better in the end, some people just don’t want to deal with that or it’s their job and they can’t afford to deal with that. I’m sympathetic to the latter case, less to the former but that’s just my opinion

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I was one of the former. Photography isn’t my job, but it’s really important to me, and photo editing was a show stopper for me for a long time. Even after I moved to Linux full time, I was using remote desktops, VMs and whatever else I could manage to get Adobe stuff working, without having to switch back to Windows. I endured, because I’d finally hit a threshold where that pain was worth putting up with in preference to Windows and its built in ads and spyware.

          But when I finally gave up on getting Lightroom working on linux, I figured I had no choice but to learn a linux compatible workflow… It was either that, or go back to windows, and that wasn’t happening…

          • fascicle@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            16 hours ago

            That was exaclty me like three years ago now. I stopped editing photos for like a year because I got so fed up with windows and did the switch cold turkey. No idea why it took me so long to just watch a few workflow videos on darktable but I use it constantly now I feel like I could do better but I’m comfortable

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I found darktable pretty user friendly TBH. The thing I’ve been struggling with is image editing - I can’t find something that has a decent workflow. I’m not looking for anything fancy. Paint.net on windows more than met my needs when I was spending more time in windows.

        • nautevenkidding@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          For me it was the same back some years ago - paint.net was the software I probably missed the most. Between Pinta and Krita, I tend to find everything I need. Pinta is most similar to paint.net imo, quite a bit more basic, but the same toolkit and design philosophy I’d say.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          My biggest issue with darktable was the masking. It’s so different in darktable, but once I understood it, all the barriers fell away

          I can’t find something that has a decent workflow. I’m not looking for anything fancy

          I import, sort and tag my photos with Digikam, and then open them with darktable for editing.

          • IMALlama@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Sorry, I meant a decent editing workflow. Things along the lines of editing - adding outlined text, moving and/or removing things, etc. For example, I’ve tried gimp a few times but I’ve found myself fighting against the way it wants you to do things.

            • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Digikam is built from the ground up to be a photo cataloger. Hierarchical tags that you can click on to expand or contract, the ability to jump from a given photo to all photos taken on the same date, or all photos in the same folder, or all photos that share a particular tag. Collapsible folders and tag structures, the ability to toggle child tag/folder recursive view on or off, image grouping (automated by filename/timestamp/burst). They also share metadata perfectly well through EXIF data, so anything I do in one is visible in the other right away.

              This is digikam

              This is the same folder in darktable

  • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Their dumb installer is a web app incorrectly displayed under wine. If you install an Adobe program in a virtual machine then copy its files not every programs work. Like Premiere doesn’t work but Photoshop and Audition seems to work.

  • 474D@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This should be applicable to “alternatively sourced” PS installs too then?

    • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      alternatively sourced

      I think old versions pre-adobe cloud have been working pretty well for a long time, IIRC. It’s really the latest versions that most companies force employees to use that are messed up.

      But Adobe cloud is, like, 12 years old now IIRC so you’d have to be using a pretty old version.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It could take a while to get into Wine. The test suite is pretty extensive and automated but patches can break things as well as new tests may need to be developed to ensure that testing is accurate.