fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agoHD 137010 bmander.xyzimagemessage-square209fedilinkarrow-up1974
arrow-up1974imageHD 137010 bmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square209fedilink
minus-squareVenat0r@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-23 days agoAnd you’ll only need about 320 million GWh per ~80kg person… plus 4 million GWh per kg of supplies, equipment and ship weight…
minus-squarebufalo1973@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-22 days agoSo 340 PWh per person. A couple of guys with a static bike and a dynamo and that’s it😜 Note: the Earth receives 170 PWh of energy from the Sun in a year.
minus-squareVenat0r@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoSounds feasible for a fusion reactor to provide at some point in the very distant future.
minus-squarebufalo1973@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoTwice the full energy the Sun gives the Earth in a year for each person is not a future fusion reactor level. 😀
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 days agoOh and also thats just the pure energy for acceleration/deceleration, not life support, steering, thrust ineffeciencies, take off, landing etc… 😅
And you’ll only need about 320 million GWh per ~80kg person… plus 4 million GWh per kg of supplies, equipment and ship weight…
So 340 PWh per person. A couple of guys with a static bike and a dynamo and that’s it😜
Note: the Earth receives 170 PWh of energy from the Sun in a year.
Sounds feasible for a fusion reactor to provide at some point in the very distant future.
Twice the full energy the Sun gives the Earth in a year for each person is not a future fusion reactor level. 😀
Oh and also thats just the pure energy for acceleration/deceleration, not life support, steering, thrust ineffeciencies, take off, landing etc… 😅
Great Scott!