who@feddit.org to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoNotepad++ Hijacked by State-Sponsored Hackersnotepad-plus-plus.orgexternal-linkmessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1314cross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgopensource@lemmy.mlopensource@programming.devtechnology@lemmy.mlopensource@programming.devtechnology@hexbear.nethackernews@lemmy.bestiver.senotepadplusplus@programming.devhomelab@lemmit.online
arrow-up1314external-linkNotepad++ Hijacked by State-Sponsored Hackersnotepad-plus-plus.orgwho@feddit.org to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square59fedilinkcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgopensource@lemmy.mlopensource@programming.devtechnology@lemmy.mlopensource@programming.devtechnology@hexbear.nethackernews@lemmy.bestiver.senotepadplusplus@programming.devhomelab@lemmit.online
minus-squarepiccolo@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-22 days agoThe point of signing software is to ensure the software was not tampered from the publisher. Linux package managers solve this by comparing a gpg key from the publisher with the software’s. There is no need for a corporate giant to “vet” software.
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoI guess, the point was there’s nothing doing that in windows, and you will have to check manually or use an expensive M$ certificate
The point of signing software is to ensure the software was not tampered from the publisher. Linux package managers solve this by comparing a gpg key from the publisher with the software’s. There is no need for a corporate giant to “vet” software.
I guess, the point was there’s nothing doing that in windows, and you will have to check manually or use an expensive M$ certificate