nytimes.com
www.nytimes.com

I’m a little wary of plug-in solar in the US. Some of the bills propose allowing 1200 watt panels which can overload wiring depending on what else is on the circuit and how in the wall wiring is run. Limiting plug-in panel wattage to, say, 400 watts might be necessary

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.comEnglish
    18·
    16 hours ago

    In Washington state, a labor union representing electrical workers and the Association of Washington Business, a regional business group, testified against the state’s plug-in solar bill. Neither responded to questions about their position.

    Spokeswomen for Puget Sound Energy and Avista Corporation, two Washington State utilities that testified against the bill, said their companies had safety concerns about plug-in solar technology and were waiting to see how the issues are addressed.

    Yeah I called PSE and asked about plug in solar. They said it was illegal to use on “their network”. And they gave that same spiel. Safety. They should partner with someone to make safe balcony solar kits for Washington state homes and apartments.

    No vision.

    • cynar@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      47 minutes ago

      Back feeding power is always problematic. A proper system should detect and match the mains before providing power. Once they become normalised then lower quality kit will start hitting the market.

      The problem comes when they have to do line work etc. The power is intended to only flow 1 way, so turning it off, and making it safe is easy. It only takes 1 dodgy plug in solar to deliver a lethal shock to someone working on the line. Even worse, it could suddenly appear either by being plugged in, or the sun coming out, so a tested safe line can suddenly become hot.

      It’s worth noting that fixed solar can also have this issue. However, it’s a lot easier to regulate and enforce with fixed installs.