• Rooster326@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Why would you ever want this?

    If you pushed the bug that took down production - they aren’t gonna whataboutism the AI generated it. They’re still going to fire you.

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It makes little difference IMHO. If you crash the car, you can’t escape liability blaming self driving.

      Likewise, if you commit it, you own it, however it’s generated.

      • mattvanlaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It’s mainly for developers to follow decisions made over many iterations of files in a code base. A CTO might crawl the gitblame…but it’s usually us crunchy devs in the trenches getting by.

    • mattvanlaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Sorry, but as another reply: pushing bugs to production doesn’t immediately equate to firing. Bug tickets are common and likely addressing issues in production.

        • mattvanlaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I guess you mean like full outtage for all users? My bad just a lot of ways to take the verb “down” for me. Still, though, what a crappy company to not learn but fire from that experience!