• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    No, I don’t think I’d agree. Something gave birth to something with a mutation that caused it to lay eggs that we’d call chicken eggs that produce chicken. Itself was born from a creature that didn’t lay chicken eggs.

    • JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well now i think im inclined to agree with you.
      I have been defining it as a true chicken is the animal that came from the egg and reproduces the same animal in egg form.

      But if you were to say instead that the final mutation that created the gentically distinct animal we call a chicken, would still be that animal regardless of how it was created.
      Similar to if a chain of self replicating robots is traced back to the origonal unit, its still a self replicating robot even if the first was built by hands.