Disclaimer: I know I’m dredging up a long dismissed argument from 10 years ago, and discussing it in all the same tone as people did back then, despite everyone having moved on. My core thesi…
Did you read the article or both of his articles before commenting on this. Movies already had works like Metropolis 49 years after the first moving images were captured. Ebert’s articles are written 56 years after Tennis For Two, the first rudimentary game. Somehow games are always going to be “a young medium.”
A medium that’s less than a century old is young. Books have been around for thousands of years, plays for longer than that. Even films have been around for over a hundred years now.
Did you read the article or both of his articles before commenting on this. Movies already had works like Metropolis 49 years after the first moving images were captured. Ebert’s articles are written 56 years after Tennis For Two, the first rudimentary game. Somehow games are always going to be “a young medium.”
I think it’s her articles unless I am missing where she states she prefers he/him pronouns.
Don’t she/her Roger Ebert (his articles are what I was referring to).
A medium that’s less than a century old is young. Books have been around for thousands of years, plays for longer than that. Even films have been around for over a hundred years now.
reread my comment