cm0002@infosec.pub to Linux@programming.dev · 3 days agoAn upcoming California law requires operating system providers to enforce basic mandatory age verificationwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1222file-textcross-posted to: cyberbezpieczenstwo@szmer.infolinux@lemmy.mltechnology@hexbear.netpcgaming@lemmy.caprivacy@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.seprivacy@programming.devlinustechtips@lemmit.onlinepcmasterrace@lemmit.online
arrow-up1222external-linkAn upcoming California law requires operating system providers to enforce basic mandatory age verificationwww.pcgamer.comcm0002@infosec.pub to Linux@programming.dev · 3 days agomessage-square55fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: cyberbezpieczenstwo@szmer.infolinux@lemmy.mltechnology@hexbear.netpcgaming@lemmy.caprivacy@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.seprivacy@programming.devlinustechtips@lemmit.onlinepcmasterrace@lemmit.online
minus-squareBrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up45·3 days agoStill fucking stupid and just a slow creep towards some bullshit like “kernel level age verification” where most Linux distros can’t possibly comply because the chip manufacturers won’t work with developers to certify unless they pay a $10,000 fee.
minus-squarepivot_root@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·3 days agoIt’s like Secure Boot but actually, 100% useless.
Still fucking stupid and just a slow creep towards some bullshit like “kernel level age verification” where most Linux distros can’t possibly comply because the chip manufacturers won’t work with developers to certify unless they pay a $10,000 fee.
It’s like Secure Boot but actually, 100% useless.