• Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    Haven’t had a Motorola in many years. Hopefully this works out well and we get a really nice piece of hardware that isn’t subject to the whims of Google.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    According to the article, it was a little obvious that it’d be Motorola. To me it’s unexpected as I wasn’t following this all that closely. In any case, I’m personally pleased with the OEM choice. I’ll need to do some research on Motorola’s smartphones to prepare for the one/s that support Graphene.

    • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They are basically stock android with minimal bloatware for a decent price. I’ve been using them for years. There’s the whole Lenovo scandal but its hard to find any decent phone I want nowadays so concessions need to be made somewhere

  • pemptago@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    MWC 2026 announcement likely, but devices may not ship until 2027

    Motorola is expected to formally announce the partnership [in March]. With MWC 2026 around the corner, the timing would make strategic sense.

    In case others were wondering, MWC 2026 is March 2-5. So, hopefully we’ll have official verification by the end of the week.

  • iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    10 hours ago

    While I’m happy that it’s Motorola, i just wish someone like Fairphone also bites the bullet of investing in a proper encryption chip that’s acceptable to Grapheneos. I’d like to see more or a trifecta (duofecta?) of trustworthy OS and sustainable/committed manufacturer.

    • skarn@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      GrapheneOS requires I think a few other things, like the possibility to completely disable the data lines in the USB port, and a bunch of others.

      The problem with Fairphone is that they have rather high demands (e.g. long term support for hardware, better production practices) but they are a rather small outfit, so the default answer from parts manufacturers is “talk to the hand”.

      As they grow they’ll become more interesting

      I would argue that Fairphone with /e/OS is a combination of a committed/sustainable manufacturer with a trustworthy OS. It does not actively spy or screw with you, and it tries to prevent snooping in many places.

      Of course it’s not nearly as security hardened as GrapheneOS, so that may be an unacceptable compromise to come.

    • detren@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think they just released the fair phone 6 not too long ago so it’ll take a while even if it’s on the tables.

      • iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I know…I guess it’s just wishful thinking for the future. I’ve gotten a 2nd hand pixel pro last year. That’s…a lot of storage and memory, just about as much as my laptop. Should last me for a while (I hope it won’t physically break for any reason!), so I won’t immediately ride this Motorola wave anyway.

      • skarn@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I wouldn’t say that it’s pretty similar.

        They have rather different goals and feature sets.

        Sent from my FP4 with /e/OS.

      • Luffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Im sorry, I think your have spelled LinaegeOS, an OS thats not even security based but to support old Hardware which security has already been compromised by missing Firmware.

        • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If we want GOS to grow, we need to welcome and help people understanding the differences. We don’t need to be pedantic schmucks.

          Sent from my GrapheneOS phone

    • Goretantath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Now is this the REAL Motorola or is it the brand name that Lenovo got a hold of. Cause real Motorola doesnt make consumer phones anymore.

      • iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Lenovo’s Motorola, if you ask me. I don’t think there’s much left at all from original Motorola. But they had a decent track record with their recent phones, AFAIK. Not that I’ve owned any from Motorola.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The best thing about Motorola is that they ship with a very stock android ROM. It’s also the worst bit, because there’s nobody maintaining any software. Handballing software maintenance to GrapheneOS would be sweet.

    • excursion22@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Ooo I’m sure this is likely for future models, but I was actually pondering getting a cheap pixel to try out graphene and see what it’d be like compared to my Razr. Maybe I’ll have to wait a bit to see how this develops.

      • plateee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You can find older pixels on swappa for cheap - my understanding is that we won’t see a GrapheneOS phone earlier than 2027 (which admittedly is only 9 months away).

  • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Glad to see this. Motorola seemed like a solid choice. Hopefully we’ll get some specs and release dates when they officially unveil it. I know it was pushed back to 2027, so I’m hoping for a Q1 2027 release. I’ve been holding off on getting a pixel in the hopes of getting a non-Google GrapheneOS phone. It would be nice if I don’t wind up having to wait too much longer.