• quips@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is again part of the problem. You can understand the fundamentals of ML in like an hour or less. A quick start guide being like 12 hours long is insane.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think that’s accurate, though. How do you explain dialectical materialism, historical materialism, imperialism, why capitalism is fundamentally unsustainable, revolutionary strategy, and more in under an hour?

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can definitely explain most of those in a way a 5 year old could understand in under 20 minutes.

        Not dialectical materialism though. I’ve read about it and had it explained to me more time than I can count, and my brain refuses to hold on to what it means.

        • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          I’ve read about it and had it explained to me more time than I can count, and my brain refuses to hold on to what it means.

          I had the same problem up in until I had Stalin explain it to me:

          https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm

          (It’s short, to the point and when one “hence” paragraph after the other comes, you will start to understand)

          Alternativly if you’re not the reading type:

          https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HAEgTPK-oiU

          (Taken from a vietnamese schoolbook)

        • Riverside@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          From a Marxist-Leninist: there are some Marxist authors contesting the emphasis on the “dialectics” part of dialectical materialism. Paul Cockshott is a good example, you can search for Cockshott’s criticism of dialectical materialism, maybe if the concepts don’t stick to you you could have a more Newtonian materialist view