Is your legal team frustrated with the attribution clause? Tired of putting “Portions of this software…” in your documentation? Those maintainers worked for free—why should they get credit?
It would be really funny if those companies find out in a few years that they don’t own copyrights to any part of their code base because they don’t have documentation what was AI generated and what wasn’t.
But given that we live in a bourgeois society, the legal apparatus will probably find a way to bail out the bourgeoisie from the consequences of their greed.
“workers should not be compensated for their work” is the end goal of these ghouls and they are not even hiding it anymore
It would be really funny if those companies find out in a few years that they don’t own copyrights to any part of their code base because they don’t have documentation what was AI generated and what wasn’t.
https://www.courthousenews.com/supreme-court-denies-appeal-in-ai-generated-art-case/
But given that we live in a bourgeois society, the legal apparatus will probably find a way to bail out the bourgeoisie from the consequences of their greed.