• turdas@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      I don’t understand how people think it’s such a big deal anyway. I mean, it’s functionally the same thing as calling someone a moron or an idiot or an imbecile, yet I don’t know anyone who has any problem with those words. All are obsolete medical terms for intellectually disabled people, used in modern parlance to insult someone’s intellect.

    • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The venn diagram of people who “don’t understand” incredibly easy to understand concepts, and people who wish that there were no words to describe people who “don’t understand” incredibly easy to understand concepts.

      • Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There’s describing someone’s inability to understand easy concepts and there’s using a medical condition in a derogatory manner.

        Similarly, frowning upon the n-slur does not imply that we have no more words for referring to people of color.

          • Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            That is not what I suggested. I compared your logical fallacy to a more extreme example in hopes that you notice how short-sighted your argument was.

            To remind you, your comment implied “If I can’t use <swear word>, how else will I refer to <group of people>?”.

            There are plenty of other words you can choose from both in place of the r-slur and the n-slur. Arguing that this in any way limits your vocabulary is incredibly narrow-minded.