Nuclear power is an unacceptable danger, and the waste stays toxic for longer than humans will be here. Not having nuclear power is what we should want.
If there is a push to enrich it in canada, I would presume canada is making nukes, as they can make the reactor fuel at the same time. Does Canada have nukes? They should, hate to say it. But those reactors are trouble waiting to happen.
Well it’s a balance between minimizing fossil emissions, and minimizing nuclear proliferation. Canada can buy fuel from the UK, France and the US as long as the alliances are maintained. If there’s a push to break these alliances, everything must be reevaluated.
Nuclear power is not the answer, and it shows how weak minded people are that they let Peter Thiel and his ilk manipulate them into supporting it here in the US.
Nuclear power is an unacceptable danger, and the waste stays toxic for longer than humans will be here. Not having nuclear power is what we should want.
If there is a push to enrich it in canada, I would presume canada is making nukes, as they can make the reactor fuel at the same time. Does Canada have nukes? They should, hate to say it. But those reactors are trouble waiting to happen.
Well it’s a balance between minimizing fossil emissions, and minimizing nuclear proliferation. Canada can buy fuel from the UK, France and the US as long as the alliances are maintained. If there’s a push to break these alliances, everything must be reevaluated.
Nuclear power is not the answer, and it shows how weak minded people are that they let Peter Thiel and his ilk manipulate them into supporting it here in the US.
The answer to what?
That comment belies your motive.
It isn’t a comment, it’s a question. You’re saying nuclear power “is not the answer”. Please explain.
Edit: Hey sorry bud, I thought you knew what you were talking about.