• BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is so outrageous that I find it hard to believe. The cost of the entire US Forest Service must be minuscule, especially if you compare it to cost of waging unnecessary, illegal, and unethical wars all over the planet.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      132
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m sure this isn’t really about saving money. It’s about destroying the US Forest Service. That’s the direct goal.

      • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        2 days ago

        In a few years: “These unkempt forests are a real eyesore, what if we sell the land to private entities”

        • TachyonTele@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Within three years: “These unkempt forests…"

          They’re going to try and steal as much of it as possible while Taco is in charge

    • ritsku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s probably so they can destroy climate change research and distract people yet again from other atrocities. Oh and drill or whatever they want to do with the land.

    • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is also the second time that he’s tried this. The first time was during his previous term, and though he was forced to reopen everything by the courts, the fact that he sold some of the federal land to (I think) oil companies was never acted upon, despite it being illegal to sell public land to corporate interests.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah this is more of a re-org than an elimination. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/03/climate/forest-service-research-stations.html

      Still seems like it might cause problems but it’s not the catastrophic change some people are making it out to be. And the Forest Service isn’t just a bunch of tree-hugging conservationists their mission is basically the sustainable exploitation of US forests. So for that reason they are very important to industry.

      • ooterness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s “just a reorg” where they shut down all the research labs (which can’t be moved because they’re located by the forests they study) and hand leadership to pro-logging lobbyists.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s actually $9B a year…which I wouldn’t call “minuscule” like PBS was.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        3 days ago

        The point is Trump will never do anything that isn’t for deeply personal reasons. And he would never do anything solely to save money on the budget, he doesn’t care about that at all. So either he does this out of pure spite, because it is a “liberal” thing, or more likely he does it because he has been bribed by whatever industries are eager to turn all that forest into shortsighted profit.

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Fine. But calling 9 billion dollars, an amount of money most people can’t even fathom, “minuscule” is pretty stupid.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            In the federal budget context, that is literally a few dollars. It is super disingenuous to compare it to the budget of a single person.

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wildland Fire Management and the Wildfire Adjustment

        The largest share of FS appropriations goes to the WFM account. The WFM appropriation funds preparedness, or fire prevention, detection, equipment and training; wildfire suppression; and salaries and expenses.

        Overall, in FY2025, 51% of the agency’s discretionary appropriations, including supplemental appropriations, were provided for these two accounts (26% WFM, 25% wildfire adjustment).

        https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13101