California lawyers argued that the law applied equally to all law enforcement officers without discriminating against the U.S. government, and that it was important for public safety.

An appeals court has blocked a California law passed in 2025 requiring federal immigration agents to wear a badge or some form of identification.

The Trump administration filed a lawsuit in November challenging the law, arguing that it would threaten the safety of officers who are facing harassment, doxing, and violence and that it violated the constitution because the state is directly regulating the federal government.

  • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zipEnglish
    13·
    12 days ago

    What are the implications here? Are federal workers immune to all state laws? Can the USPS tear through my neighborhood drunk driving at 98mph? Can DOE labs dump toxic chemicals in the woods, so long as they don’t cross state lines? Can HUD developments just ignore all building codes?

    • aow@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      3·
      11 days ago

      Re: USPS, yes. The difference is that they’d be punished internally and referred over to the state. If you’re driving a mail truck you can’t be legally stopped by the police because of jurisdiction. Does that matter in practice? Not really, because the average person will act to minimize harm and voluntarily stop or stop someone who is a danger to others.

      • Wilco@lemmy.zipEnglish
        3·
        11 days ago

        A postal vehicle can be stopped by police … but when they are stopped they must be let go within 15 minutes or be charged with delaying the mail service 18 U.S.C. § 1701–1703

        This would be enforced by a postal inspector and moved to a federal prosecutor (US Attorney) and the charge bypasses all qualified immunity.

        For this reason the police almost never mess with postal vehicles.

        Source: I got stopped in a postal vehicle by a state trooper for bypassing a weigh station … it went really badly for the guy.