You must log in or # to comment.
deleted by creator
The answer is money.
deleted by creator
Good
So what is the downside of this? It seems like a net-positive. Decreased demand for fossil fuels is great! It’s a shame it took a bunch of death and destruction, but now that it has happened, the silver-lining is quite shiny.
deleted by creator
If only there were a way to generate near unlimited amounts of energy without fossil fuels.
The entire concept of GDP is going to be the end of humans
deleted by creator
Pardon my ignorance but… So what? Like, what if somecountry isn’t winning the economic dick waggling competition?
deleted by creator
That number is not actually representative of how much food they produce, though.
deleted by creator
Still not represented by GDP
deleted by creator
lower GDP
What America may need to grok is that GDP is not the same as happiness, and in a choice between the two GDP seems to be irrelevant.
This is why China is pursuing electrification. If transportation is battery powered, oil decouples from GDP.
They seem to be the only country on Earth that is actually taking this seriously. Everyone else seems to think oil is forever.
As with all rules of thumb, they don’t tell the whole story. Using fossil fuel usage as the sole stand in for energy usage, in an age when fossil fuel usage is being replaced by a different source… Is dumb.
deleted by creator
Hydraulics already work off electricity. We already have electric cargo ships. Electric planes and semi trucks already exist. The percentage of machines that absolutely require fossil fuels at this point is shrinking rapidly.
Using an outdated metric continues to be dumb, regardless of your own limited awareness of the alternatives.
notice he made an assessment on getting more pil for the North Sea as a useless idea, meanwhile down in dumb fuck Australia
Trump just casually solving the climate crisis here.
Oh hey it’s the thing ive been saying. This guy is stealing my material! /joking
@zdhzm2pgp great!
