• Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s all about geography , if China was on the map like Australia or more like the US they wouldn’t have any problems if they had plenty of space and no neighbors.

    • m532@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 days ago

      “They shouldn’t have built their country near our military bases”

    • calmblue75@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Can’t understand what you’re saying. Can you elaborate? The propaganda against China is not coming from its neighbours as far as I know.

    • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      What no political theory does to a mf

      Geographical environment is unquestionably one of the constant and indispensable conditions of development of society and, of course, influences the development of society, accelerates or removed its development. But its influence is not the determining influence, inasmuch as the changes and development of society proceed at an incomparably faster rate than the changes and development of geographical environment. in the space of 3000 years three different social systems have been successively superseded in Europe: the primitive communal system, the slave system and the feudal system. In the eastern part of Europe, in the U.S.S.R., even four social systems have been superseded. Yet during this period geographical conditions in Europe have either not changed at all, or have changed so slightly that geography takes no note of them. And that is quite natural. Changes in geographical environment of any importance require millions of years, whereas a few hundred or a couple of thousand years are enough for even very important changes in the system of human society.

      It follows from this that geographical environment cannot be the chief cause, the determining cause of social development; for that which remains almost unchanged in the course of tens of thousands of years cannot be the chief cause of development of that which undergoes fundamental changes in the course of a few hundred years