• 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d guess a high percentage of the people with laptops that can draw that much power

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Really?

        Unless you have a dedicated GPU I don’t see 240W being practical

        Most systems have a CPU with a TDP of around 35-60W

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’m not sure I understand where you’re coming from, let me just clear up where I’m coming from in case I’m confusing things:

          Obviously most users won’t have a laptop that can draw 240W

          Though additionally, laptops that are able to draw 240W do exist today (there’s even some that come with 360W barrel jack chargers now IIRC). Yes, they’re for enthusiasts or professionals, but they still exist, so unless the spec prevented it*, they should be included in consideration too IMO

          Given this is legislation that applies with a pretty broad stroke, I was making the point it’s kinda arbitrary to stop applying it at 100W.

          *Another commenter made the very good point though, that the 240W standard is simply too new to be part of this legislation. So kinda satisfied with that answer