• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Well, there’s two things to consider.

    One is just how many folks “self diagnose”. Rather than a stigma being reduced, it’s often held up as a trait of superiority to the “normies”, so some folks will assert it. There’s a fine line to walk between unfair stigma versus unjustified glorification. The internet is full of this.

    Two is that ultimately, there’s room for being subjective even among professionals. See the parents of a kid that my kid was friends with. They lamented they got told by 5 psychologists that their kid was not autistic before they finally found one that “correctly” saw the kid’s autism. They were so excited to have proof that their kid was one of those autistic folks that are super smart…

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      One is just how many folks “self diagnose”.

      I’m not sure this would count towards any statistics of over-diagnosis though, as a self-diagnosis isn’t a diagnosis.

      Two is that ultimately, there’s room for being subjective even among professionals.

      This is true. Ultimately it’s humans judging humans and there will be errors in the process.

    • julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Good example. It‘s not only about how many people take a test, but also if the test is taken multiple times. Then you are in realm of statistics.

      Probably to find the true result would be to consult those earlier doctors with the diagnosis of that last doctor. They might have missed something (or not).