Finnish Sisu GTP 4×4 armored vehicles have appeared in the arsenal of Ukraine’s Special Operations Forces.This is reported by military historian Andriy Haruk.The appearance of these armored vehicles in Ukraine […]
Because when you border russia and you let them know that you’ve sent away your limited amount of armored vehicles or other equipment isn’t stratetically wise. Other countries declaring equipment they’ve sent makes sense but for countries bordering russia it would not be wise to let their enemy know what equipment they’ve given up.
NATO can airlift a large amount of medium armor within days to an attacked country, I don’t think this a necessary deception, it is more advantageous to underline the decisive advantage.
Because when you border russia and you let them know that you’ve sent away your limited amount of armored vehicles or other equipment isn’t stratetically wise. Other countries declaring equipment they’ve sent makes sense but for countries bordering russia it would not be wise to let their enemy know what equipment they’ve given up.
NATO can airlift a large amount of medium armor within days to an attacked country, I don’t think this a necessary deception, it is more advantageous to underline the decisive advantage.
Is this NATO in the room with us right now?
Yes? https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/deterrence-and-defence/strategic-airlift