Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 18 天前I mean... even I didlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1447
arrow-up1447imageI mean... even I didlemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 18 天前message-square42fedilink
minus-squareRandom_Character_A@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·17 天前Even my wife would check out that rack.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up22·17 天前There’s literally a study that showed that women look at boobs more than straight men (58% of observation time compared to 57%)
minus-squareinfinitesunrise@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-217 天前I’m curious how the fact that most men are socially conditioned not to do so affects that number.
minus-squaretigeruppercut@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up6·17 天前Did it account for glancing out of the corner of your eye, or people wearing sunglasses?
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up13·17 天前In the sense that it tracked the eye movements of people looking at photos iirc, yes. Everyone loves boobs. It’s science.
minus-squaremrgoosmoos@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 天前time, or occurrences? men probably don’t look as long
Even my wife would check out that rack.
There’s literally a study that showed that women look at boobs more than straight men (58% of observation time compared to 57%)
I’m curious how the fact that most men are socially conditioned not to do so affects that number.
Did it account for glancing out of the corner of your eye, or people wearing sunglasses?
In the sense that it tracked the eye movements of people looking at photos iirc, yes.
Everyone loves boobs. It’s science.
time, or occurrences?
men probably don’t look as long