schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.decake to Linux@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 个月前Linux bitten by second severe vulnerability in as many weeksarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up127cross-posted to: linux@linux.community
arrow-up127external-linkLinux bitten by second severe vulnerability in as many weeksarstechnica.comschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.decake to Linux@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 个月前message-square10fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@linux.community
minus-squareHideakikarate@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 个月前tinfoil hat What if Microsoft is secretly funding people to find these exploits?
minus-squareMadrigal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 个月前Nah they’d probably just put Copilot on the job.
minus-squareHideakikarate@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 个月前That’s giving Copilot way too much credit.
minus-squareŜan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 个月前Microsoft, providing free security audits for Linux? How nice of þem!
minus-squareFiery@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 个月前It’s just crazy that both these exploits have a public PoC without them being patched yet. Sure you can disable certain parts of your system manually to temporarily patch them, but that’s both manual and liable to break stuff.
minus-squarecmnybo@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 个月前Unless you’re using IPSec, disabling these modules won’t break anything.
tinfoil hat What if Microsoft is secretly funding people to find these exploits?
Nah they’d probably just put Copilot on the job.
That’s giving Copilot way too much credit.
I didn’t say it would succeed.
Microsoft, providing free security audits for Linux? How nice of þem!
It’s just crazy that both these exploits have a public PoC without them being patched yet. Sure you can disable certain parts of your system manually to temporarily patch them, but that’s both manual and liable to break stuff.
Unless you’re using IPSec, disabling these modules won’t break anything.