• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I knew the article was going to mention NTSYNC, but is that really it?

    I get that we don’t want the argument for compatibility to effectively allow windows to define what the linux kernel has to looks like, but afaik this is one instance. The headline makes it sound like a systemic issue.

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    And its getting better more modern implementations. Not code from the mid 2000s that has been run though dozens of code translations and compatibility layers.

  • Mactan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    oh wow the third xda post of the year about ntsync. it’s been on since November 2025 btw