Multiple researchers using the same tools to find the same bugs are creating ‘unnecessary pain and pointless work’

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah, there’s a ton of spam now. My view is that devs should use LLMs themselves to scan for issues, and then see if there’s anything to fix. But when it comes to accepting reports or patches, you kind of have to be selective. A lot of the time stuff LLMs will flag can be either hallucinated, or not really an issue. A lot of the reports come from automated systems that don’t really do any due diligence to figure out if something is an actual issue that needs addressing. So, I can definitely understand why projects might want to stop accepting random bug reports or code submissions going forward.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fully automated systems that file issues sound like a nightmare. I hope it’s easy to ban those as they appear.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah, honestly that’s the dumbest thing anybody could think of. It’s just a pure waste of resources that wastes people’s time. Even if these systems find genuine issues, the sheer volume of spam ensures nobody is going to actually look at them.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        The next few years are going to be interesting because we’re moving into uncharted territory in a lot of ways. There’s a ton of hype around LLMs, and tons of people abusing this tech in every which way, and then there are useful nuggets where people figure out how to apply it effectively. Eventually we’ll need to figure out how to suppress the noise and how to start using these things in productive ways.