FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agoToo reallemmy.worldimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1810file-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
arrow-up1810imageToo reallemmy.worldFoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square78fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
minus-squareHonytawk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-212 hours agoNo, it is just really difficult to go from digital yo analog. In analoge, it doesn’t matter if something is misaligned by a milimeter. The tollerance is pretty big. But digital is always exact. It doesn’t have the leeway to go off the exact path. So if something is misaligned even slightly, the mismatch grows exponentially. And that is when the conversion from digital to analog breaks down. Meaning, printers will always suffer until we can make analog as exact as digital, which is a very big ask we are currently unable to reach.
No, it is just really difficult to go from digital yo analog.
In analoge, it doesn’t matter if something is misaligned by a milimeter. The tollerance is pretty big.
But digital is always exact. It doesn’t have the leeway to go off the exact path.
So if something is misaligned even slightly, the mismatch grows exponentially. And that is when the conversion from digital to analog breaks down.
Meaning, printers will always suffer until we can make analog as exact as digital, which is a very big ask we are currently unable to reach.