"Who AI benefits and who it immiserates often is based on who gets to decide how it’s used. We know how tech is used on the day to day. We should be at the table as well."
I congratulate them on their victory of unionizing their positions for the two months they have left before being laid off as part of “AI restructuring” or whatever fancy term absolves them from legal repercussions.
Only time will tell, but for everyone’s sake I hope you’re wrong. Either way you can’t reasonably claim that workers standing up for their rights is a bad thing. Worst-case it lays the groundwork for something better adapted to a post-AI industry later on.
I didn’t say it’s a bad thing. I said it’s useless. Unions are great, but they are no longer effective. Action is required. And if you look back six years, everything supports what I’m saying.
I congratulate them on their victory of unionizing their positions for the two months they have left before being laid off as part of “AI restructuring” or whatever fancy term absolves them from legal repercussions.
Only time will tell, but for everyone’s sake I hope you’re wrong. Either way you can’t reasonably claim that workers standing up for their rights is a bad thing. Worst-case it lays the groundwork for something better adapted to a post-AI industry later on.
I didn’t say it’s a bad thing. I said it’s useless. Unions are great, but they are no longer effective. Action is required. And if you look back six years, everything supports what I’m saying.