gnufuu@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 13 hours agoSloupinfosec.pubimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1435
arrow-up1435imageSloupinfosec.pubgnufuu@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 13 hours agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·9 hours agoThey didn’t add any code to jqwik. It was just an instruction. A string.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 hours agoDoes that really make a difference?
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 hours agoYes? If it had been in the readme it would have worked the exact same way. It’s not code, they aren’t pissing in anything. Literally no one but an AI would have a problem with it.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·6 hours agoyes. normal usage works as expected
They didn’t add any code to jqwik. It was just an instruction. A string.
Does that really make a difference?
Yes? If it had been in the readme it would have worked the exact same way. It’s not code, they aren’t pissing in anything. Literally no one but an AI would have a problem with it.
yes. normal usage works as expected