• lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 hours ago

    as soon as he’s not in control, there will be fuckery

    This is what I don’t think a lot of people will be prepared for …

    I dread if there’s gonna some useless MBA coming around afterwards and saying some shit like: “why don’t we charge steam users $9.99 to play their games per month?” and start cutting projects that benefit gamers to “save money” – who needs Proton? who needs to invest in things like couch co-op? Then give themselves a shitload of money in exchange for all the goodwill that Valve have built up over the years.

    • Smaile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      49 seconds ago

      I’m ready for it, I “backed up” my steam library because of it. The whole movement these last few months against steam make me think the industry is coordinating against it because steam won’t play ball.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      But Valve is not a public company, so you don’t get randos. Gabe is very aware of this fact himself.

      • Aneorthisio@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        Yeah, since Valve is not public the odds of the next head being an outside hire or some loud tech exec are extremely low.

        GabeN is most likely to pick someone who’s been around with the company since the early days, like Erik Johnson or Scott Lynch.

        If he wants it to stay in the family, his own son Gray could take over, he’s also a game dev.

        Gabe has often expressed distrust of publicly traded markets, a plausible outcome is that his ownership gets converted into an employee-owned trust or a collective buyback, this would effectively permanently lock Valve into its current profile, distributing profils back into salaries and bonuses for the staff.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yep. This is how it goes downhill.

      Some business analyst will make a pretty chart showing a massive revenue increase Vs some minor player attrition caused by the monthly subscription model, and the board will salivate at all those billions they’re gonna get.

      Is that revenue necessary? Not at all. But capitalism says you must maximise profits regardless for the sake of it, and without an all powerful overlord to say otherwise, it will be a tragic downfall.

    • Mikina@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I really hope Linux will get a bigger market share, thanks to Steam devices, before Steam has to change CEOs and starts the inevitable enshitification.

      Because for Linux gaming, Steam’s support for Proton is pretty much a monopol.

      Most of 3rd party launchers for other stores also rely on Proton under the hood, IIRC.

      • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Nobody stops EGS to implement Proton. Neither ActiBlizz, Ubisoft or EAs Origin.

        The “monopoly” in this case is again just other stores not wanting to do what gamers want. Proton is FOSS and anyone can use it.