fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agoWe got a skimmermander.xyzimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1488
arrow-up1488imageWe got a skimmermander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareWater_Melon_boy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoIm genuinely confused. Then why even cite those articles? Is there a hard rule for “You must cite this much articles” before publishing?
minus-squareHolla@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 days agoI think that has to do with this xkcd:
minus-squareAllero@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoOften yes, also, you may genuinely have to review A LOT of articles to make your point, and at that point, reading them in whole alone is gonna take you a few weeks time.
Im genuinely confused. Then why even cite those articles? Is there a hard rule for “You must cite this much articles” before publishing?
I think that has to do with this xkcd:
Sounds Legit!
Sounds legit [1].
[1]
Often yes, also, you may genuinely have to review A LOT of articles to make your point, and at that point, reading them in whole alone is gonna take you a few weeks time.