• OccamsTeapot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ok thanks.

    Your definition seems a little cherry picky. Ignoring the obvious role of hard power and over-focusing on capital seems like a mistake. But I don’t know enough anyway. Wiki’s definition makes more sense to me

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Hard power is used to maintain imperialism. The reason the export of capital is important is that this is what allows imperialist countries to siphon all of the wealth from the global south, vs. just selling them things. Wiki’s definition is vague enough to apply to Burkina Faso kicking France out, ie it turns anti-imperialism into imperialism.

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Kicking someone out is not “extending power over foreign nations.” That is “resisting foreign nations trying to extend power over you.”

        You’re being ridiculous and clearly not taking the definition as intended. Your definition is the problem here

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s absolutely extending your power over a foreign nation. Resistance to domination is the enforcement of your own will over that of others. Wiki’s definition is intentionally vague to the point of being worthless, while the historical analysis of imperialism as originated with theorists like Hobson and extended by Lenin, Nkrumah, and Cheng Enfu describes an actual system, its material causes and mechanisms, and describes why it exists and how to end it. The wiki definition is like defining capitalism as “trade” and saying Marx was being ridiculous by analyzing it further.

          Here’s a good summary of imperialism. Treating imperialism like a vibe, and not like a material process, means we are incapable of learning how to stop it.

          • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            “Extending” is the key word here. You aren’t extending any power if it’s your own nation, it would be the other party who did that.

            Anyway, thanks for the link, I’ll check it out!

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Extension is a relative term. Burkina Faso is extending its own influence to that of France by kicking them out. Every action has a reaction, in regaining their sovereignty they have reduced France’s. This is a good thing, but if we are being technical, it counts as imperialism according to Wikipedia. This is obviously an absurd statement, but that’s the point, Wikipedia’s definition isn’t actually a technical one, and instead is trying to describe a gut feeling more than a material process with concrete characteristics and motions.

              And no problem!