• RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 小时前

    The drives are write-once media — data cannot be erased or rewritten once stored

    I could find a use for these. My pacman package cache maybe.

  • Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 小时前

    Read and single write capability is an interesting proposition for archival purposes. 8-10MB/s write and 50-200MB/s read speeds

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 小时前

      I do photography, and I like to keep the original RAW photos from the camera. So, this sort of thing would be perfect for me. I don’t really need fast write access, since I just want to back the photos up and it’s not time sensitive.

      • gnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 小时前

        What form would that take? They seem to indicate lifetime on the centuries, similar to expectations for M-DISC.

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 小时前

          Gonna guess glass deformation over time is going to come into play (really (like millennia) old windows get thicker at the bottom), probably why the quartz version of this is speculated to be good for millions of years. And of course breakage. The drives will fail first.

          Sucks to be Microslop sitting on this for years and years and China comes along and eats your lunch. Ha Ha.

          Hopefully a story soon to be repeated with RAM and then chips, about time there was real competition.

            • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              46 分钟前

              Yeah, I’ve heard that and I’ve seen pictures of examples, dunno. Personally, anything beyond a century is irrelevant anyway.

          • untorquer@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 小时前

            Spin them once daily or weekly. As long as they’re balanced that should randomize the gravity vector.

            It’s also almost certainly a different composition than century old glass panes made for buildings. So the material itself might mitigate this issue

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 小时前

          Like the other user mentioned, glass warping/deformation. Although I’d reckon kinetic impacts, tremors, or actual drive failure would occur first (the real question is what are the maximum tolerances before a read/write fails or ends in data corruption).

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 小时前

    More bytes is more bytes. Flood the market until big AI firms can’t afford to monopolize the hardware anymore and finally collapse so we real people can finally compute again.

    • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 小时前

      These would be useless for AI given the high write requirements inherent to any form of ‘AI’ in use today; but data centers would absolute eat these up for low-write CDN usage, i.e. netflix which only updates their catalogue once every few days but needs high read speeds for multiple users. So we’d still be competing with data centers for them, but luckily just much fewer.

      It would make (assuming it can fit in a standard 3.5" bay) petabyte+ home data servers pretty trivial to set up though which is pretty neat. 4k Jellyfin data hoarders should rejoice.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 小时前

        Like I said, more bytes is more bytes. Even if it’s a niche use case, that takes pressure off of other use cases.