cm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 2 months agoProton has respond on redditlemmy.mlimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1189cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1189imageProton has respond on redditlemmy.mlcm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square71fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
minus-squareHeartyOfGlass@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 months ago… not used an LLM to write their apology? I mean, I’m satisfied. This indicates to me they don’t care. That’s all I need to hear.
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-22 months agoThere is no proof they used an LLM. Plus, LLMs are trained on human text anyway, who actually talk like this… it’s not like LLMs invented their own way of speaking. Would you have preferred no apology at all?
minus-squareHeartyOfGlass@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoMy preference is for companies to not use LLMs for public communication.
minus-squarewyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoAnd, the scholarly applause of us anons, of course. ☝🏼
… not used an LLM to write their apology?
I mean, I’m satisfied. This indicates to me they don’t care. That’s all I need to hear.
There is no proof they used an LLM. Plus, LLMs are trained on human text anyway, who actually talk like this… it’s not like LLMs invented their own way of speaking.
Would you have preferred no apology at all?
My preference is for companies to not use LLMs for public communication.
And, the scholarly applause of us anons, of course. ☝🏼