Quis renovatores renovat — who updates the updater?

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      2 days ago

      Worse. It encourages selling them to the black market instead.

      The illicit market for newly discovered security vulnerabilities generally pays pretty well, especially if you can demonstrate implementation. The only reason it’s not a much bigger problem is that most security researchers have some moral compunctions and the professional desire to fix problems, not proliferate them.

      If the companies basically tell the security researchers to pound sand, that encourages making a living elsewhere.

      • iocase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        This is why the ISS exists BTW. It was a jobs program for ex-soviet rocket scientists since by definition they’re all weapons specialists who just happen to be launching satellites instead of nukes.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      These days there’s so much slop in the world that 0day reports end up being worthless. The idea is sound, but far too many people are abusing the system and so they’re not worth having anymore.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        The report is only because there’s a 0-day sploit. It’s not like some cogsucker can make it up and get paid.

        Okay so we’ll have to have a neutral third-party confirm them, but really that will have to happen now anyway since no one will trust AMD to pay their promises.